Skip to Main Content
IBM Security Ideas Portal

Shape the future of IBM Security

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including the product roadmap, by submitting enhancement ideas that matter to you the most.

Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and vote for them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Vote for ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.


Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Post an Idea

To post a new idea - click on the "Add a new idea" button and where asked select the appropriate category this idea relates to. Provide requested information to allow us to get a better understanding of your request.


"Missing" Security Products?

If you cannot find the IBM Security product you are looking for then it is probably located in the IBM Security Private Ideas Portal. Check that site to open an idea.


Idea visibility

All ideas submitted via this portal are visible to all other portal users, though personal information fields remain hidden. If you would rather have your idea visible to only you and IBM then use the IBM Security Private Ideas Portal instead.


Please note: The purpose of the Ideas Portal is to tap the creativity of the IBM Security community so that we can enhance our products for everyone! If you need to report a defect or get help, please use our normal support channel. Click here to open a support ticket.


Want to see all of your IBM ideas in one place? Find them at ideas.ibm.com

ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

IBM Guardium Other

Showing 35 of 3342

Add ability to select multiple category as a Classifier rule category attribute

Currently the UI only supports a single category for a classifier category attribute value. Such as SOX, Sensitive, CCPA and so on. Clients would like to indicate rules that falls under multiple category. such as both CCPA and SOX, or CCPA and PII...
2 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 2 Under review

Add regular expression test for catalog search

Currently regular expression test is only available for data search. Catalog search can also use regular expression. Allowing regular expression test for catalog search will make it more useful.
2 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 1 Under review

Add fire with marker option for catalog search rule in Classifier

Currently fire with marker is only supported in the data search rule but not in the meta data / catalog search rule
2 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 1 Under review

Add ability in group builder to create Classifier datasource group

Currently group builder does not support the creation of datasource definition group for classifier. Group builder should support the creation of any group within Guardium including classifier datasource group.
2 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 1 Under review

Add ability to import/export classifier data source group and members from CSV

Currently there is an option to download/export the classifier datasources as CSV, however there is no option to download or upload/import the classifier datasource group and its members from a CSV. This option is not available in the classifier d...
2 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 2 Future consideration

Add datasource group cloning/duplication ability in Classifier UI

Data source definition UI currently does not support cloning or duplication of existing data source groups.
2 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 1 Future consideration

Support for Namespaces in integration with Hashicorp Vault

Please add a functionality for Guardium configuration form in Hashicorp Vault integration to include a dialog box to choose Namespace. As the default when configured it uses the root namespace which client does not have access to.
3 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 2 Under review

Entitlement assessment builder required for making Entitlement Reports scanning and reporting scaleable (similar to what we have for VA)

Entitlement Reports (ER) implementation in Guardium consists of a set of pre-defined Custom tables that can be scheduled for population via pre-defined queries. As of today, ER feature is not scalable for the following reasons:1) There are no grda...
5 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 1 Future consideration

Configuring Data Archive - Limit S3 API call from guardium UI for a specific folder only instead of entire bucket

Configuring Data Archive - Limit S3 API call from guardium UI for a specific folder only instead of entire bucketFound issues while guardium is trying to test connection with s3 because it was trying to read all the objects in the bucket, which co...
6 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 1 Under review

Enable Guardium Group wildcards for Classification Policy Data Rules

Sometimes, for specific types of sensitive data, it's not possible to specify a Regex to find repeatable patterns. For example, when trying to look for addresses or surnames contained in DB data, a Regex is not suitable. For these type of use case...
7 months ago in Guardium Data Protection / IBM Guardium Other 1 Under review