Skip to Main Content
IBM Security Ideas Portal

Shape the future of IBM Security

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including the product roadmap, by submitting enhancement ideas that matter to you the most.

Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and vote for them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Vote for ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea


Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.


Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.


Post an Idea

To post a new idea - click on the "Add a new idea" button and where asked select the appropriate category this idea relates to. Provide requested information to allow us to get a better understanding of your request.


"Missing" Security Products?

If you cannot find the IBM Security product you are looking for then it is probably located in the IBM Security Private Ideas Portal. Check that site to open an idea.


Idea visibility

All ideas submitted via this portal are visible to all other portal users, though personal information fields remain hidden. If you would rather have your idea visible to only you and IBM then use the IBM Security Private Ideas Portal instead.


Please note: The purpose of the Ideas Portal is to tap the creativity of the IBM Security community so that we can enhance our products for everyone! If you need to report a defect or get help, please use our normal support channel. Click here to open a support ticket.


Want to see all of your IBM ideas in one place? Find them at ideas.ibm.com

ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

Verify Governance

Showing 117 of 3226

Allow to map AD groups from different OUs to different applications

Hi, We have configured an application called App1 in IGA and then ran a reconciliation job to bring all users and groups (from different OUs) into IGA under App1. Then after few months, we came across a requirement to create one more App called Ap...
18 days ago in Verify Governance 0 Future consideration

Adding Hierarchy-based-filter-options for user-selection within the Access Request-Workflow

Within the access request-WF you have to select the identity you want to create the request for. At the moment there are only few filter options available (ID, Business Activities, Name). In order to request e.g. a Business Role for more than one ...
22 days ago in Verify Governance 0 Future consideration

Prevent Multiple Logins From Different Machines

Currently SVG / IGI allow same user credentials to log in from different IP's, machines / sources at the same time. You can login as an admin from your laptop and also from another pc. Both sessions stay and continue to work. This is considered a ...
about 1 month ago in Verify Governance 1 Not under consideration

showing in a workflow request to the beneficiary, who else has "like mike" functionality for one application

we want to use the like mike functionality on a self workflow request for one application but, for now, the beneficiary can't view the other users using the like mike, but he can view only himself. The client is asking two points: 1) That the bene...
about 1 month ago in Verify Governance 0 Future consideration

Consolididated Dashboards for Users with multiple DailyWork-Tabs (e.g. Approver)

Within a standard implementation Users with multiple dailywork tabs or recertification campaigns, that originate from different admin-roles and scopes are shown Dashboards for each an every dailywork tab/Role-Recertification-combination. In a worl...
about 1 month ago in Verify Governance 0 Under review

Workflow Auth Node skipped for manual apps

During an admin console generated ARM request for manual applications the AUTH node is skipped. Workflow structure GEN > AUTH > EXEC. We need AUTH node for proper authorizations to be assigned.
about 2 months ago in Verify Governance 2 Not under consideration

Support Encrypted ISVG DB

A IAM RFP has a specific requirement to support all data encrypted in solution stores. We can't propose Guardium only to cover one requirement in a IAM RFP.
about 2 months ago in Verify Governance 1 Future consideration

IGI 5.2.6.3: dissect roles on users when they only lose some permissions that make up the role

By the word "role" we mean IT, External and Business Roles. when a user has a "role" that contains one or more permissions or other roles, and if one of permissions is removed by target, principal role should be splitted in its "child" role and pe...
3 months ago in Verify Governance 1 Functionality already exists

Approver Details should be visible for User Update requests

For User Update operations, IGI does not display approver details (Name / IGI ID). Same feature is available for Access Requests, where user can calculate approver and it displays name / IGI ID of the approver.
3 months ago in Verify Governance 0 Future consideration

Remove accesses from user records which failed at target

Use Case: User submits access request in IGI (Entitlements and Accounts). E.g. XYZ group on AD account. IGI adds the account and entitlements to user in IGI, then proceeds with execution of request at the target application. For some reason, if re...
3 months ago in Verify Governance 0 Future consideration